Letter to AGS Members on Diversity and Inclusion

Dear AGS,

The executive committee met recently with members to discuss diversity and inclusion (D&I) within our organization identify actions we can take to increase and diversify membership and evolve as a scientific community. The Geological Society of America issued a position statement on diversity and inclusion in 2010, revised in 2013 and 2016, that offers suggestions for fostering a diverse and inclusive geoscience community. The executive committee is supportive of this position statement, and hope that members of the Austin Geological Society will reflect on how our organization and each of us as individuals can contribute to positive progress. Some of these recommendations include:

• Austin Geological Society members should seek opportunities to effectively communicate the value of a diverse workforce and recommend the implementation of suitable diversity practices to all levels of government, private industry, and academia. Members are encouraged to work with print, electronic, and broadcast media to promote the value of rational approaches for addressing critical diversity issues. Members who participate in diversity issues are encouraged to share their experiences at society meetings, and if possible provide local examples where these practices have been successful.

• Austin Geological Society members should seek opportunities to effectively communicate the value of a diverse workforce and of implementing suitable diversity practices to community groups. The public must be able to respond in an informed manner to diversity decision‐making; thus, a growing need exists for the public to be educated about the value of diversity.

• Austin Geological Society members should participate in professional forums, town hall and other civic meetings for open community discussions on the importance of a diverse workforce and of implementing suitable diversity practices. Discussions should emphasize the value of rational information for diversity and its sustainability outcomes.

• Austin Geological Society should support geoscientists’ communications with decision makers regarding the value of a diverse workforce and of implementing suitable diversity practices. AGS should seek expertise and advice that can help members participate in diversity policy decisions by creating talking points on common diversity problems and by providing examples of how they can participate in diversity decisions by becoming members of relevant decision‐making bodies. AGS and its members should work toward identifying local and regional issues that affect diversity and action that could help improve the rational basis for diversity decisions. AGS and its members can also bring the GSA Position Statement to the attention of lawmakers when legislation affects diversity.

• Austin Geological Society should work towards raising awareness of diversity issues by identifying published articles on the links between diversity and geoscience planning and management decisions.

• Austin Geological Society and its members should draw upon the rich diversity of other geological societies and the earth-science community as a resource for individuals when selecting organizing committees, invited speakers, and nominees for offices and awards.

The executive committee has discussed some ideas for immediate action, including establishing a Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) chaired position. We welcome membership participation on this new committee. We also welcome any constructive and proactive ideas that will help AGS address this important and vital concern for the continued growth of our membership and scientific community.

New Publication: Hydrogeologic Atlas of Southwest Travis County

atlas cover.JPG

On March 2, 2020 a talk was given to AGS titled: “Hydrogeology of Western Travis County.” The report is now available on the BSEACD’s website—click here. The Table of Contents of the atlas is shown below.

This study presents a compilation of existing and new hydrogeologic data intended to improve the collective understanding of groundwater resources in SWTC and beyond. We hope the results of this study will provide a baseline for future groundwater studies of the region and help inform strategies and policies to manage and protect the region’s groundwater resources.

Printed versions will come soon and we plan to have all the digital (GIS) data available in the near future.

Atlas Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1. Introduction and Study Area

2. Regional Tectonics, Paleogeography, and Depositional History

3. Study Area Hydrostratigraphy

4. Geophysical Logs

5. Geologic Basemap

6. Hydrogeologic Investigations

7. Geologic Cross Sections

8. Structure and Isopach Maps

9. Travis County Multiport Monitor Well

10. Wells and Pumping

11. Groundwater Flow

12. Groundwater Hydrographs

13. Surface and Groundwater Interactions

14. Groundwater Chemistry

15. Aquifer Properties and Availability

16. Hydrogeologic Areas

17. Conclusions and Future Work

18. References Cited

TBPG 2020 Customer Service Survey

2020 Customer Service Survey

We have extended the deadline for TBPG's 2020 Customer Service Survey.

If you haven't already done so, please take a moment to let us know how we are doing, and how we can improve our service to you. The survey takes only a couple of minutes. 

To participate, please follow this link: Customer Service Survey.

Please respond by Monday, May 11, 2020.  All surveys that are submitted on or before that date will be included as part of our Report on Customer Service and will be submitted to the Legislative Budget Board and the Governor's Office as part of TBPG's Strategic Plan. 

Survey results will be posted on our website once the Strategic Plan has been submitted. 

Thank you for participating!

Rene D. Truan

Executive Director

Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists